Why JAMStack over WordPress and others?

Here, we have compared various technologies to build your website


Harish Deivanayagam

5 minutes to read

As a JAMstack expert who has developed various JAMstack websites, I understand that having an online presence is crucial to success.

The framework you choose for your web development significantly influences your website, often the first point of contact for potential clients or audiences.

There are many tools and platforms in the web development landscape, each claiming to be the best fit for your project. But, I've found that the differences in these approaches are substantial. It's crucial to find the one that aligns perfectly with your objectives.

Performance and cost efficiency can make a huge difference in your digital journey. In my experience, three notable web development methodologies stand out: JAMstack, WordPress, and Webflow. I've taken it upon myself to dissect and compare these approaches, focusing on their cost-effectiveness and performance.

By the end of this journey, you'll have the insights needed to make an informed decision regarding your web development strategy. So, join me as I unveil the path for crafting remarkable websites.

Section 1: Understanding the Basics

1.1 JAMstack: Modernizing the Web

JAMstack is a modern method for building websites that focuses on simplicity, speed, and security. It separates the front-end and back-end, which means most tasks are handled in the user's browser. This results in fewer server requests, enhancing website performance and speed. JAMstack was developed to make web development more efficient and secure, and it uses modern technologies including content delivery networks and headless CMS.

1.2 WordPress: The OG CMS

WordPress is a widely recognized platform that revolutionized content management and website creation. Initially designed as a blogging tool, WordPress has since evolved into a comprehensive content management system. Unlike JAMstack, it integrates both front-end and back-end functionalities into a monolithic solution.

History: Matt Mullenweg introduced WordPress in 2003, and its initial purpose was to simplify blogging. Over the years, it has expanded to accommodate various website types, thanks to an extensive ecosystem of themes and plugins.

1.3 Webflow: Empowering Design-First Approaches

Webflow provides a unique, codeless way of creating and hosting websites through a drag-and drop interface. This user-friendly approach to web development allows for easy manipulation of web elements without needing extensive HTML or CSS knowledge. Like WordPress, it integrates front-end and back-end smoothly. Webflow was born out of a need for a simpler web development solution, enabling users to create custom websites with ease.

JAMstack vs WordPress vs Webflow:

JAMstack's architecture separates the front end from the back end, improving efficiency and security by reducing server requests. This increases website performance and speed. WordPress and Webflow use a traditional model, combining content management and presentation, which though effective in some cases, doesn't match JAMstack's efficiency and security. These distinctions lay the groundwork for comparing their cost, performance, and other aspects.

Section 2: Cost Comparison

Regarding web development, cost considerations play a pivotal role in choosing the right platform. In this section, we'll dissect the financial aspects of each technology, providing insights into the associated costs and their long-term implications.

2.1 JAMstack: Streamlined Efficiency

JAMstack, with its architectural simplicity, offers a cost-efficient approach to web development.

  • Initial Setup

    : JAMstack's initial setup costs are often higher due to the need for development and configuration. However, this cost is outweighed by the long-term benefits.

  • Hosting:

    Hosting expenses for JAMstack are notably economical. With static site deployment and the use of content delivery networks (CDNs), costs are minimized. Many providers offer free hosting options, and even premium services are budget-friendly.

  • Maintenance:

    Maintenance costs for JAMstack are considerably lower than other options. The decoupled architecture minimizes the need for extensive updates and troubleshooting.

2.2 WordPress: Licensing and Expenses

WordPress, the veteran in the realm of web development, has its unique cost considerations.

  • Licensing:

    WordPress itself is an open-source platform, which means it's technically free. However, certain plugins and themes may come with licensing fees. Over time, these expenses can accumulate.

  • Hosting:

    Hosting WordPress sites may vary in cost, depending on the provider and the site's scale. While shared hosting is affordable, more extensive websites may require higher-tier hosting plans.

  • Plugins and Themes:

    Customization through plugins and themes is a hallmark of WordPress. While there are free options, premium plugins and themes can add up, impacting the overall cost.

2.3 Webflow: Subscriptions

Webflow introduces a unique pricing model, emphasizing the importance of design-first web development.

  • Subscription Fees:

    Webflow operates on a subscription-based model, with different tiers based on the user's needs. These subscriptions encompass various aspects of website creation, including hosting.

  • Additional Costs:

    While Webflow offers a comprehensive package, some functionalities may require third-party integration or custom development, potentially incurring additional expenses.

JAMstack vs WordPress vs Webflow:

When considering long-term implications, JAMstack shines in terms of cost-efficiency. The streamlined architecture, low hosting costs, and minimal maintenance requirements make it a cost-effective choice for scaling web projects.

WordPress, while initially cost-effective, may become pricier as a site's complexity and customization demands increase.

Webflow, on the other hand, provides an inclusive solution but might lead to higher costs due to subscription fees and potential additional expenses.

Cost-Efficiency of JAMstack: JAMstack's financial advantages become evident when assessing scalability and ease of maintenance. Its decoupled architecture streamlines the development process, reducing the time and costs associated with upkeep and updates.

As a result, JAMstack emerges as the cost-efficient champion in the comparison of these web development technologies.

Next, we'll shift our focus to performance, the cornerstone of user experience and website success.

Section 3: Performance Showdown

User experience is the heartbeat of the digital world. In this section, we'll dissect the performance aspects of each platform, evaluating page loading speed, security, SEO optimization, scalability, and their real-world implications.

3.1 Page Loading Speed

When it comes to web performance, page loading speed takes center stage. It directly impacts user engagement, bounce rates, and SEO rankings.

  • JAMstack:

    JAMstack's architecture, with its static site generation and content delivery networks (CDNs), excels in speed. Static files, pre-built and optimized, resulting in lightning-fast loading times.

  • WordPress:

    WordPress can achieve decent page loading speed, but it heavily depends on factors such as hosting quality and the number of plugins and themes. Extensive customization can affect load times.

  • Webflow:

    Webflow offers responsive designs, but the loading speed can vary based on the complexity of design and interactions. It leans more on the design front, potentially impacting speed.

3.2 Security Measures

Ensuring a secure digital presence is non-negotiable. We'll examine the security aspects of each platform.

  • JAMstack:

    JAMstack's architecture minimizes vulnerabilities. With no server-side rendering, the risk of server attacks like DDoS is significantly reduced. Content delivery via CDNs enhances security.

  • WordPress:

    WordPress, while secure, is vulnerable to third-party plugin security issues. Relying on numerous plugins and regular updates is crucial to maintain security.

  • Webflow:

    Webflow handles security aspects, but like WordPress, it depends on third-party integrations. The security posture is as robust as the integration partners.

3.3 SEO Optimization

Visibility in search engine results is crucial. We'll evaluate the SEO potential of these platforms.

  • JAMstack:

    Its fast speed and content-code separation align with Google's Core Web Vitals, enhancing SEO.

  • WordPress:

    It has numerous SEO plugins. SEO success relies on the plugin stack, content, and updates.

  • Webflow:

    It offers SEO tools for optimization. SEO success depends on content quality, meta tags, and structured data.

3.4 Scalability and Handling High Traffic

Web projects face scalability issues during traffic surges.

  • JAMstack:

    Maintains consistent performance with high traffic, effectively distributes load via CDNs, and scales seamlessly.

  • WordPress:

    Handles high traffic well with proper hosting, but complex customizations may need more server resources.

  • Webflow:

    Performance under high traffic depends on subscription tiers; top-tier subscriptions manage increased loads effectively.

Section 4: Flexibility and Customization

Freedom in shaping the digital experience is vital. In this section, we'll delve into the flexibility and customization aspects of each platform, shedding light on their unique offerings.

4.1 JAMstack's Flexibility

JAMstack empowers developers to make tech choices. Let's explore the realms of its flexibility.

  • Front-end Frameworks:

    Developers have the liberty to pick their preferred front-end frameworks. Whether it's React, Vue, or Angular, JAMstack plays nicely with them all.

  • Headless CMS:

    JAMstack works seamlessly with various headless CMS options. Editors can manage content independently from the front end, enhancing efficiency.

  • API Integration:

    The architecture supports third-party APIs, enabling easy integration of services like payment providers, e-commerce systems, and more.

4.2 WordPress's Adaptability

WordPress has garnered a reputation for adaptability. Here's a look at its customization landscape.

  • Plugins:

    WordPress boasts a vast library of plugins. Users can enhance site functionality with e-commerce, SEO, security, and various other plugins.

  • Themes:

    Themes offer customizable design options. Users can choose themes that align with their brand or create custom designs.

4.3 Webflow's Design Flexibility

Design enthusiasts find solace in Webflow's design-centric approach.

  • Design Control:

    Webflow prioritizes design control. Users can create visually stunning websites with a focus on UI and UX.

  • Visual Editor:

    Its visual editor allows users to drag and drop elements, making the design process intuitive.

Section 5: Ease of Use

Creating an optimal web development experience involves understanding the ease of use. In this section, we'll navigate the user-friendliness of each platform.

5.1 JAMstack's Developer-Centric Approach

JAMstack puts developers in the driver's seat. Here's an insight into its user-friendliness from a developer's perspective.

Developer Empowerment: Developers have the freedom to choose tech stacks that align with their expertise, creating a tailored experience.

Learning Curve: The flexibility JAMstack offers comes with a learning curve. Developers may require time to grasp the diverse technologies.

5.2 WordPress's Suitability for Non-Technical Users

WordPress has been cherished for its user-friendliness, making it accessible to a broader audience.

  • User-Friendly Dashboard:

    WordPress offers an intuitive dashboard for content management. Non-technical users can comfortably create and edit content.

  • Plugin-Based Functionalities:

    Plugins expand functionality without coding. Users can access a plethora of plugins to enhance their websites.

  • Learning Curve:

    While WordPress is beginner-friendly, mastering advanced features and troubleshooting may require time.

5.3 Webflow's Balance Between Design and Functionality

JAMstack vs WordPress vs Webflow: Unleashing the Web's Full Potential9Webflow strikes a balance between design and functionality. Let's explore its ease of use.

  • Visual Editor:

    Webflow's visual editor simplifies design. Users can drag and drop elements, making the process intuitive.

  • Design-Centric Approach:

    Prioritizing design aligns with designers and creatives, ensuring a seamless design experience.

  • Learning Curve:

    Webflow's design-centric approach may require design proficiency, and integrating complex functionalities can be challenging.


Though JAMstack requires a higher initial investment, it provides cost-effective hosting and maintenance, important for scalable projects.

Performance-wise, JAMstack excels with fast loading times, robust security, SEO optimization, and scalability. It also offers customization and flexibility, integrating with front-end frameworks, headless CMS, and APIs. Yet, it's developer-centric and has a steep learning curve.

Conversely, WordPress and Webflow offer integrated solutions, combining content management and presentation. They suit different projects' needs.

At Zetahive, we have honed our expertise in JAMstack development. Over the past years, we have successfully delivered more than 10 projects using this technology. Our team is well-versed in leveraging the strengths of JAMstack to craft efficient, secure, and high-performing websites.

We understand that every project is unique, and we are committed to aligning our skills and expertise with your vision and goals. With Zetahive as your JAMstack development partner, you can trust us to guide you on the right path to a successful web presence.